|
|
Case #1 |
Case #2 |
Case #3 |
SCANNING: |
Problem |
smoking, drinking and vandalism in a high school lavatory reported by custodial workers |
tagging and graffiti at the back of an office center noted by property managers |
nighttime ATM patron robberies reported to police |
Stakeholders |
- students
- faculty
- staff (includes custodial workers)
- administration
- police/SRO
- parents
|
- property owner
- property management
- tenant businesses
- police
- adjacent property owners and managers (depending on outcome of analysis)
- tenants and patrons of adjacent businesses (depending on outcome of analysis)
- traffic engineering or transit
|
- robbery victims
- other bank and ATM patrons
- bank management
- bank employees
- corporate security
- police
- property owner or management (if different from the bank)
- adjacent property owners and management (depending on outcome of analysis)
|
Process |
- small group meetings (faculty group, student group, custodial group), OR
- CPTED task force
- stakeholder interviews
|
- small group meetings (property management, tenants, adjacent property owners, and managers)
- stakeholder interviews
|
|
ANALYSIS: |
Crime Data |
- number of incidents (from maintenance records related to vandalism)
- temporal distribution of problem
- typical scenario or MO,
- similar problems and their locations elsewhere in school
|
- number of incidents (from maintenance records)
- temporal distribution of problem
- offender characteristics based on analysis of graffiti and tagging
|
- number of incidents reported to police
- other reports or indications of “unusual” behavior
- temporal distribution of incidents
- offender characteristics from victim reports and CCTV tapes of robberies
|
Population Characteristics |
|
- residents, employees, patrons, and visitors to the area
|
- area residents, employees, patrons and visitors
|
Land Use and Development Patterns |
|
- adjacent land uses
- activity patterns and use schedules
|
- adjacent land uses
- activity patterns and use schedules
|
Traffic, Transportation and Transit Systems |
|
- traffic volumes and travel patterns
- pedestrian routes (sidewalks, greenways, trails, and informal paths)
- parking lots/garages and loading facilities
- transit routes, stops, or transit centers
|
- traffic volumes and travel patterns
- pedestrian routes (sidewalks, greenways, trails and informal paths)
- parking lots/garages and loading facilities
- transit routes, stops, or transit centers
|
Resident or User Surveys, Stakeholder Interviews |
- custodial workers, students, faculty, and administrators
- known and perceived problems
- offender identification
- strategy recommendations
|
- property management interviews
- surveys of tenant businesses
|
- victim interviews
- corporate security interviews
|
On-Site Behavioral Observations |
- lunchtime “movement” (use of cafeteria and other locations on campus); multiple days in the case of changing schedules
- activity and use of lavatory during remainder of school day
- activity and use of lavatory during sporting events
|
- after-hours use and nighttime movement, both weekday and weekend, and both on-site and to/from adjacent properties
|
|
Safety Audits and Security Surveys |
- building floor plan
- room/space assignments
- class, cafeteria and sporting event schedules
- locking systems and CCTV
- maintenance and repair policies and procedures
- cafeteria policies and procedures
- hallway monitoring policies and procedures
- student code of conduct (application, enforcement, consequences, etc.)
|
- building design
- site layout and landscaping (e.g., fencing), and relationship to adjacent properties and nearby land uses
- lighting and CCTV
- maintenance policies and procedures
- hours of operation for tenant businesses
|
- building design and any related corporate policies
- ATM location and design
- site layout, including relationship to adjacent properties and nearby land uses
- CCTV and lighting
- security policies and procedures
- hours of operation and staffing
|
RESPONSE: |
Opportunities to Control Access |
- close cafeteria and campus (no one leaves), which requires changes to lunch schedules
- install lock on lavatory door
- install barricade, removing access to gym/sport area(s)
|
- perimeter fencing, removing access to the site
- graffiti-resistant paint/surface treatment on problem areas
|
- remove ATM completely, or move it to another location (including automobile access rather than walk-up)
- change hours of operation and availability of ATM
- install fence between ATM and drive-through bank lanes
|
Options for Providing Opportunities to See and Be Seen |
- change faculty monitoring assignments
- install CCTV
- change lavatory design to improve visibility
|
- increase light levels
- install CCTV
- trim or remove vegetation
- increase police patrol (through site as well as around site)
- hire private security to patrol
|
- increase police patrol or hire private security
- increase lighting around the building, especially in the drive-through area
|
Opportunities to Define Ownership and Use, and Encourage the Maintenance of Territory |
- limit the area available for lunch outside the cafeteria
- change lavatory available during lunch periods to one in an area that is more easily supervised
- immediately repair and replacement of damaged fixtures, etc.
- consistently enforce school policies and consequences for policy violations
|
- negotiate alternative use strategies with neighboring property owners (e.g., “no readmittance” policy to keep skaters inside the building)
- immediately repaint when graffiti is installed
|
|
ASSESSMENT: |
Possible Scenarios to Look For Over the Long-Term |
- there is no evidence of smoking, drinking or vandalism in the lavatory, OR
- the problem occurs infrequently and only during sporting events when the lavatory is unlocked, OR
- changes to lunchtime monitoring have resulted in fewer behavioral problems in other areas near the cafeteria, not just in the problem lavatory, OR
- the problem appears in another lavatory or another location at the school, OR
- the problem has changed, e.g., the problem is now bullying, not vandalism, OR
|
- there is no evidence of tagging or graffiti on the site, OR
- the amount and/or frequency of graffiti is reduced, OR
- “hanging out” and other problems at the skating rink have been reduced or eliminated, OR
- graffiti problems shift to another location on this site or elsewhere in the neighborhood, OR
- graffiti continues to be a problem, OR
- the problem has changed, e.g., the problem now includes vandalism to lighting, OR
|
- the robbery problem is eliminated, OR
- the adjacent commercial strip is seeing new investment and increases in patronage, OR
- ATM patrons are now robbed at their cars, OR
- ATM robberies move to another bank, OR
- other types of robbery are emerging in the neighborhood
|